| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| tumnus |
Posted - 2006 February 02 : 16:46:51
Stephen Jablon has received retaliation from the college as a result of his actions. He has been threatened, falsely accused of living on the Santa Fe campus, and denied access to the Michael Peters' inauguration on the grounds that he did not have an RSVP even though others were admitted without RSVPs and a student had offered Stephen his RSVP. One night, he was ordered to leave the Santa Fe campus on the false accusation that he was drunk; a student who had been with him for hours knew that he had not been drinking. Incongruously with security's story, they allowed him to drive off campus. Stephen was also kicked out of the Nietzche preceptorial he was auditing a few days after he told Judith Adam, the assistant dean of the Santa Fe campus, that he was taking it. Her grounds were that the college had made a mid-semester policy change to limit the number of people in a preceptorial to 10, including auditors. As there were eleven students including Stephen, he was asked to leave. |
| 4 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Plato |
Posted - 2006 May 26 : 14:40:25
St. John's College has the legal right to undertake a variety of foolish, petty, and offensive actions. Let's not confuse the issue. What can be done is very different than what should be done. If the college's only response to this matter is a reminder of its legal rights, SJC has much bigger problems than a lawsuit. |
| moderator |
Posted - 2006 May 11 : 14:26:49
"Nobody" refers to a previous version of his or her own post. While "nobody" includes all relevant information from the original post, readers who have not read the original, unedited post may desire to see the statement that "nobody" is referring to. If you desire to correct a factual error that you have made in a post, you can acknowledge your error in a new post. It can be confusing to refer to a version of a post that you have deleted.
"Nobody"'s original post on May 5, 2006 at 6:40 pm read,
"The Campus is private property and the administation has the right to ban anyone they choose without giving a reason, just as Mr. Jablon has the right to ban anyone he chooses from his home.
"Mr. Jablon flouted this ban by attending the Croquet Cotillion on April 22."
Both versions of "nobody"'s post quoted tumnus's second post in this topic in its entirety,
"A letter dated February 10, 2006 but postmarked March 10, 2006 banned Stephen Jablon from the Santa Fe campus of St. John's College. No reason was given in the letter for this action."
This letter can be found in this website.
|
| nobody |
Posted - 2006 May 05 : 18:40:27
The Campus is private property and the administation has the right to ban anyone they choose without giving a reason, just as Mr. Jablon has the right to ban anyone he chooses from his home.
In an earlier version of this post I mentioned that Mr. Jablon flouted this ban by attending the Croquet Cotillion on April 22. The letter referenced banned Mr. Jablon from the Santa Fe campus; the Croquet Cotillion, of course, takes place on the Annapolis campus. I do not know whether Mr. Jablon is similarly banned from the Annapolis campus; therefore it was incorrect of me to say that he flouted a ban that may or may not exist. I regret the error.
I do, however, stand by my statement that the College has the right to ban Mr. Jablon, or anyone else, from campus.
quote:
Originally posted by tumnus
A letter dated February 10, 2006 but postmarked March 10, 2006 banned Stephen Jablon from the Santa Fe campus of St. John's College. No reason was given in the letter for this action.
|
| tumnus |
Posted - 2006 March 14 : 12:40:39
A letter dated February 10, 2006 but postmarked March 10, 2006 banned Stephen Jablon from the Santa Fe campus of St. John's College. No reason was given in the letter for this action. |
|
|
